Unlawful Possession of Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender

Facing an Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender Charge in Chicago? Andrew M. Weisberg Can Defend You

(Formerly known in Illinois as Armed Habitual Criminal)

Being charged with Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender is one of the most serious firearm offenses under Illinois law. A conviction carries mandatory prison time and can result in decades behind bars with no possibility of probation. Unlike many other criminal charges, this offense is prosecuted as a Class X felony, meaning that the penalties are severe and the consequences are permanent. In Chicago and throughout Cook County, prosecutors treat these cases as top-priority offenses, and individuals accused under this statute often face aggressive prosecution from the very beginning.

If you are facing this charge, it is essential to understand what you are up against and to secure experienced legal representation immediately. Chicago criminal defense attorney Andrew M. Weisberg is a former Cook County prosecutor who understands how firearm cases are investigated and prosecuted. His experience on both sides of the courtroom allows him to identify weaknesses in the State’s case and develop strong, strategic defenses designed to protect his clients’ freedom and future.

A Tougher Cook County Approach to Gun Crimes

Cook County prosecutors have adopted an increasingly aggressive approach to firearm offenses, particularly those involving repeat felony offenders. Cases that once might have resulted in negotiated plea agreements are now far more likely to proceed toward trial or significant prison sentences. The Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office treats repeat-offender firearm cases as a major public safety concern and frequently seeks lengthy Class X prison terms.

Individuals charged with Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender can expect a determined prosecution that is focused on securing a conviction. Prosecutors often resist efforts to reduce charges and typically seek substantial prison sentences even when the defendant is not accused of using the firearm in a violent offense. In many cases, simply possessing a firearm after qualifying felony convictions is enough for the State to pursue harsh penalties.

This tougher climate means defendants often face:

• Strong pressure toward Class X prison sentences
• Limited plea negotiation opportunities
• Increased scrutiny of criminal history
• Detailed investigation of alleged possession
• Aggressive courtroom prosecution

Because the stakes are so high, having an experienced defense attorney involved early in the case can make a significant difference.

What the Law Says – 720 ILCS 5/24-1.7

Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender is defined under 720 ILCS 5/24-1.7. The law applies when a person knowingly possesses a firearm after having two or more qualifying felony convictions. The statute is designed to target individuals who have been previously convicted of serious offenses and who are later found in possession of firearms.

To obtain a conviction, prosecutors must prove several elements beyond a reasonable doubt. First, the State must establish that the defendant possessed a firearm. Possession may be actual possession, such as carrying a firearm on one’s person, or constructive possession, such as having control over a firearm located in a vehicle or residence.

Second, the State must prove that the defendant has at least two qualifying prior felony convictions. These prior convictions must fall within categories defined by the statute. Qualifying offenses often include:

• Forcible felonies such as robbery, aggravated battery, burglary, and residential burglary
• Felony drug offenses such as possession with intent to deliver or drug trafficking
• Prior firearm offenses such as unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon
• Certain violent offenses or weapons violations

The State must prove both the existence and qualifying nature of these prior convictions. In some cases, errors in documentation or classification of prior offenses can create significant legal issues.

Class X Felony Penalties

Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender is charged as a Class X felony, which is among the most serious criminal classifications in Illinois.

A conviction carries:

• A mandatory prison sentence of 6 to 30 years
• No eligibility for probation or conditional discharge
• Mandatory supervised release following prison
• A permanent felony conviction
• Lifetime loss of firearm rights

Because probation is not available, any conviction requires incarceration. This makes defending the case aggressively essential from the very beginning.

In some cases, defendants may also face extended-term sentencing or additional charges that increase the overall prison exposure.

How These Cases Typically Arise

Many Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender cases arise from routine police encounters that escalate into felony charges. Common situations include traffic stops where officers claim to have discovered a firearm in a vehicle, street stops based on alleged suspicious behavior, or searches of homes or apartments during investigations of unrelated offenses.

Firearms are often recovered through:

• Traffic stops and vehicle searches
• Street stops and pat-down searches
• Search warrants
• Domestic disturbance investigations
• Execution of arrest warrants
• Anonymous tips or surveillance

In many cases, the firearm is not actually found on the defendant’s person. Instead, prosecutors rely on constructive possession theories, arguing that the defendant had knowledge of and control over the firearm.

These constructive possession cases often present significant opportunities for defense because proximity alone does not establish possession under Illinois law.

Constructive Possession Issues

One of the most important issues in many repeat-offender firearm cases is whether the defendant actually possessed the firearm. Illinois law distinguishes between mere presence near a weapon and actual possession.

For example, a firearm discovered in a shared vehicle or residence does not automatically belong to every person present. Prosecutors must prove that the defendant knew about the firearm and exercised control over it. When multiple individuals have access to the same area, proving possession can become difficult for the State.

Andrew M. Weisberg carefully analyzes possession evidence in every case, looking for weaknesses in the State’s proof and opportunities to challenge the allegations.

Constitutional Challenges

Firearm cases often depend heavily on police searches and seizures. If law enforcement violated constitutional rights during the investigation, critical evidence may be suppressed.

Andrew M. Weisberg regularly challenges:

• Illegal traffic stops
• Improper pat-down searches
• Unlawful vehicle searches
• Defective search warrants
• Warrantless home entries
• Coerced statements or confessions

If a firearm is suppressed due to a constitutional violation, the prosecution’s case may collapse.

Challenging Prior Convictions

Because this charge depends on prior felony convictions, careful review of the defendant’s criminal history is essential. Prosecutors must prove that the prior convictions qualify under the statute.

In some cases, prior offenses may not meet the legal requirements necessary to support the charge. Errors in court records, misclassified offenses, or insufficient documentation can create opportunities to challenge the charge or reduce it to a less serious offense.

The Importance of Early Representation

When facing a Class X firearm charge, early legal representation is critical. Evidence must be reviewed quickly, witnesses must be located, and legal motions must be prepared.

Andrew M. Weisberg begins working immediately to:

• Obtain and analyze police reports
• Review body camera footage
• Investigate the circumstances of the arrest
• Identify legal defenses
• Challenge unlawful searches
• Prepare for negotiation or trial

Prompt legal action often creates opportunities that may not exist later in the case.

Trial Experience Matters

Many Class X firearm cases proceed toward trial because prosecutors are less willing to negotiate significant reductions. When the possibility of trial exists, it is essential to have an attorney with real courtroom experience.

Andrew M. Weisberg has handled numerous firearm cases in Cook County courtrooms and understands how juries evaluate firearm possession allegations. His trial experience allows him to present strong defenses and challenge the prosecution’s evidence effectively.

He prepares every case as if it may go to trial, which often strengthens negotiating leverage and improves case outcomes.

Why Hire Andrew M. Weisberg

Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender cases require a defense attorney with deep knowledge of Illinois firearm law and extensive courtroom experience. Andrew M. Weisberg provides personal representation from start to finish and works directly with each client to develop the strongest possible defense.

As a former Cook County prosecutor, he understands how these cases are built and how prosecutors attempt to prove possession and prior convictions. He uses that knowledge to anticipate the State’s strategy and develop effective defenses.

Clients benefit from:

• Direct communication with their attorney
• Thorough case preparation
• Strategic legal defenses
• Extensive courtroom experience
• Knowledge of Cook County prosecutors and judges

Andrew understands that these cases often determine a person’s future and approaches each case with the seriousness it deserves.

Call Today for a Free Consultation

If you or someone you love is facing a charge for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender in Chicago, immediate legal representation is critical. A Class X firearm charge can mean years or decades in prison, and the sooner a defense attorney becomes involved, the better your chances of protecting your freedom.

Contact Andrew M. Weisberg for a free consultation at (773) 908-9811.

Andrew will review your case, explain your options, and begin building a strong defense designed to protect your rights, your future, and your freedom.

Client Reviews

Andrew is very personable and easy to speak with. He is a very knowledgeable attorney. I was able to contact him with questions, even after hours he would reply. His relationship with the prosecuting attorneys got me the best results possible in my case.

Tanner Knudsen

Andrew is one of the best attorneys I have ever worked with. Very professional and talented, compassionate, trustworthy who is always looking to get the best possible outcome for you. He communicates things very quickly, clearly and concisely. It did not matter if it was a weekend or late evening...

Anna Sroka

Beyond an incredible experience! Andrew is kind, caring, knowledgeable and honest. He handled my case with ease and made sure I understood every step of the process. He was available to me to chat anytime I had a question and he put me at ease. I cannot recommend him highly enough for any and all...

Jennifer Albertalli

Andrew was a fantastic support as he helped navigate a stressful situation. His communication skills and attention to detail provided me with the confidence that the case would be settled quickly and favorably. He is an amazing attorney and I would strongly recommend him to both friends and family.

Michael H.

I am extremely grateful for Andrew, who skillfully reduced my felony charge to a misdemeanor. He was professional, attentive, and kept me informed every step of the way. His dedication and expertise truly made a difference in my case. Highly recommend!

Chuhan Feng

Our Offices

Lincoln Park Office
2502 N Clark St
#201

Chicago, IL 60614

Skokie Office
10024 Skokie Blvd
#210

Skokie, IL 60077

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Former Prosecutor
  3. 3 Available 24/7
Fill out the contact form or call us at (773) 908-9811 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

The Washington Post
NBC News
abc News
CBC news
Variety
Associated Press
Newsweek
Bloomberg news
Aljazeera